AI Energy Management System

Professional algorithms calculate. Agentic AI connects the evidence.

The G4U AI Energy Management System combines engineering rules, physical models, statistics, machine learning and constrained optimization with evidence-grounded Agentic AI.

Managed performanceGovernance · M&V · Triple SLA

G4U AI Energy CoreEvidence · decisions · dialogue

Existing building systemsData and authorized site control

The decision core

More than another BMS. More than another chatbot.

The system operates above existing building systems and below the managed performance service. It creates governed diagnostics, forecasts, actions and performance evidence without replacing site protection or local control.

01

Data Confidence

Validate completeness, freshness, range, drift, units and lineage before formal analysis.

02

2D System Views

Explore system relationships, energy flow, operating state and evidence through configurable vector views.

03

Baseline & M&V

Compare candidate models, freeze approved references and preserve adjustments in a reproducible ledger.

04

Diagnostics

Detect performance drift, identify likely causes and quantify operational impact.

05

Forecasting

Anticipate load, expected operation and emerging performance or SLA risk.

06

Optimization

Evaluate strategies against energy, cost, indoor environment, reliability and equipment constraints.

07

Performance Ledger

Connect measures, actions, approvals, results and commercial value in one versioned record.

08

AI Energy Assistant

Retrieve evidence, compare periods, explain findings and draft structured actions and reports.

Hybrid intelligence

Different intelligence for different decisions.

Professional algorithms produce formal results. Local models support frequent, resilient analysis. Tool-using Agentic AI retrieves, compares and explains evidence across the system under explicit human authority.

Frequent local analytics

Rule, physics, statistical and machine-learning models operate close to the data where site readiness supports it.

Scheduled AI review

Daily or weekly tool-using investigations connect evidence across systems and time horizons.

Human authority

People approve formal baselines, M&V, SLA positions and higher-risk actions.

Evidence-grounded dialogue

Ask in business language. Inspect the engineering evidence.

The assistant plans a visible investigation, calls professional tools and brings the findings, supporting evidence and recommended actions together.

Illustrative investigation replay

Why did Chiller 2 efficiency deteriorate after 14:00?

  1. Object contextCH-02 · Plant A · 14:00–18:00
    01
  2. Data quality97.4% evidence coverage
    02
  3. Performance model0.82 kW/RT vs 0.68–0.75 reference
    03
  4. Root-cause toolsPhysics · rules · anomaly · impact
    04
Evidence supports ranked causes

Chiller 2 efficiency deteriorated after 14:00 as condenser-water temperature rose while the lead/lag sequence held the unit at 62% PLR.

Review condenser-water reset logic
Validate tower approach against wet-bulb
Run an approval-gated shadow test
Professional tools calculate formal values. Agentic AI organizes the investigation and explains the evidence.
Boundary

The assistant can retrieve, compare, explain and draft. It does not silently change approved values, approve high-risk actions or act as the final M&V calculator.

Model Packs

Reusable engineering logic, configured for each building.

Each pack standardizes semantics, physics, features, rules, candidate algorithms, safety constraints and tests. Site topology, available points, operating modes and parameters are then calibrated locally.

MP-01Whole Building & Main Meter
MP-02Chillers
MP-03CHW / CW Pumps
MP-04Cooling Towers
MP-05Air-Handling Units
MP-06Fresh & Exhaust Air
MP-07Owner-Controlled Common Areas
Safe authority

Automation earns authority through evidence.

Progression is explicit, approval-gated and reversible. The same safety hierarchy applies at every level.

L0

Analyse

Explain the change and show the evidence.

L1

Recommend

Draft a structured action and verification plan.

L2

Approval-gated intent

Prepare a control intent for named approval.

L3

Approved envelope

Generate intents only inside agreed modes, limits and times.

Boundary

The AI energy system does not write directly to the BMS. Authorized site controls remain responsible for command execution, interlocks and feedback.

Technical selection

Evaluate one building, its data and the decisions your team needs to improve.

Review the assessment